Breaking the Production Backlog: $1.1M in Weekly Revenue Recovered Through Operational Transformation

When TBM arrived at this multi-building manufacturing facility, the company’s highest-revenue product line was producing 7 units a day against demand requiring more than four times that output — and a backlog exceeding 180 days had quietly accumulated. The parent private equity group, recognising that the site was falling short of its financial targets and that the flagship product backlog had become a ceiling on revenue growth, engaged TBM to diagnose the operation and drive a production rate recovery. The goal was straightforward: unlock the capacity that was already there, stop the bleeding, and build a management system that would hold the gains after TBM left.

Challenge

Before improvement began, the operation was struggling with widespread breakdowns in visibility, coordination, and process discipline.

At TBM’s arrival, inventory accuracy across three buildings was below 10% — creating part shortages that halted assembly jobs mid-build and had half a dozen people per shift doing nothing but looking for lost inventory. No Clear to Build process, no standard work, and no formal management system meant supervisors spent their days expediting parts and firefighting rather than managing performance. Weld defects moved downstream undetected, paint operations were overstaffed and scattered across five areas, and the daily meeting reviewed yesterday’s problems without deciding anything about them

Solution

TBM took a focused, all-at-once approach to stabilise operations and build a scalable foundation for performance.

TBM structured the engagement as five simultaneous workstreams — inventory accuracy, production ramp, paint productivity, weld quality, and a digital management system — deployed from week one rather than sequenced in phases. Boosting assembly line output required simultaneous containment and construction: stopping the bleeding while building the systems that would prevent it from recurring. The manufacturing ramp up was tied to a phased plan — 7→10, 10→13, 13→15, 15→18 units/day — each step with specific dates, owners, and deliverables. Seven structured playbooks were transferred at Phase 1 exit, with role assignments made by name before TBM’s departure.

Results

Within six months, the turnaround delivered a $1.1M increase in weekly revenue run rate, alongside measurable gains across production, quality, and operational performance.

Over 26 weeks, this production rate recovery delivered measurable improvement across every workstream:

  • Production rate improvement: flagship product output rose from 7 to 18 units/day — a 157% increase
  • Weekly revenue run rate: $700K → $1.8M, a net gain of $1.1M per week
  • Inventory accuracy: ~10% → 91% across all buildings
  • $625,000+ in annualised labour savings confirmed through paint operations consolidation (17 → 8 staff)
  • Weld audit score: 66/90 baseline → 84/90 peak within six weeks
  • 22+ standard work documents written, trained, and live

The digital management system — iObeya SQDC dashboards, tiered daily meetings, and custom Claude AI Dashboards covering efficiency, line balancing, SKU margin, and capacity planning — now runs without TBM support. Every performance gap has an owner and a fix date before the meeting ends.

Learn more about how we help companies in the industrial equipment industry

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you improve production rates at a facility with multiple compounding operational problems?
Attack everything simultaneously, not sequentially. Stabilise material availability, gate work orders through a Clear to Build process, drive defects out of welding and paint, and stand up a tiered daily management system — all at once. The management system is what makes the other gains stick; without it, improvements erode because there's no daily mechanism to surface problems and assign owners. TBM used this approach at a PE-backed agricultural equipment manufacturer to drive a 157% production rate improvement — from 7 to 18 units per day — in 26 weeks.
What should a private equity firm prioritise when a portfolio company is missing revenue targets due to low manufacturing output?
Start with the constraint costing the most revenue per day — usually a material flow problem or a specific bottleneck like welding or paint. Expect the answer to be a set of interconnected problems, not a single fix. The highest-leverage intervention combines inventory accuracy work, a Clear to Build gate on every work order, and a management system that gives leadership daily visibility into output and quality gaps. At one PE-backed site, this approach added $1.1M in net weekly revenue within six months while locking in $625K in annualised labour savings.
How long does a manufacturing turnaround take, and what does sustainable improvement actually require?
Measurable output improvement is visible within 60 to 90 days when containment actions start immediately rather than waiting for a full diagnostic cycle. But speed and sustainability are different problems. Gains erode quickly without standard work, a tiered daily meeting structure that surfaces problems within 24 hours, and role assignments — by name — for every critical process before the engagement ends. At a PE-backed agricultural equipment manufacturer, TBM transferred seven structured playbooks at exit with every role assigned before departure. The management system ran independently from day one.

Topics in this Case Study

At a Glance

Client

PE Backed Agricultural Equipment Manufacturer

Results

  • Production rate improvement: 7 → 18 Flagship Product units/day (+157%)
  • Weekly revenue run rate: $700K → $1.8M (+$1.1M net per week)
  • Inventory accuracy: ~10% → 91% across all buildings
  • $625,000+ in annualised paint labour savings confirmed (17 → 8 staff)
  • Weld audit score: 66 → 84/90 peak in six weeks
  • 22+ standard work documents deployed and live
  • Digital tiered management system live — all departments

Win Faster with TBM.

Let’s start a conversation about operational speed.